Caveat emptor: The Wall Street Journal tosses out some interesting numbers, some of which are wrong.

I was recently embarrassed by quoting some statistics from the Wall Street Journal that were completely wrong. (I'm not saying which ones.) The WSJ people seem to be doing this more often than in the past. Perhaps there are fewer experienced editors and perhaps reporters are more rushed than they used to be.

In today's WSJ, an article ("Budget Cuts Fuel Monetary Policy Clashes," p. A2.) discusses how declining government revenues combined with rising transfer payments are turning the Federal budget into transfer payments only. Here is the graph:

The article states "Consumption and investment by all governments -- local, state and federal combined -- dropped to 17.6% of gross domestic product in the fourth quarter of 2015, matching its lowest level in 66 years, according to the Commerce Department." The fact is that the 17.6% number is for the federal government alone. But it's worse than that. The 17.6% figure is the approximate number for 2014 federal government tax receipts. Federal outlays in that year were 20.4% of GDP. So the graph relates federal tax receipts (not expenditures) to transfer payments. (The point that transfer payments are devouring the federal budget is correct, nonetheless, but the problem is not the level of expenditure as the article suggests.)

Moreover, state and local government spending isn't much less than federal spending, so total government expenditures are in the 35%-40% of GDP range, which is not abnormal.

The White House website has the following table of federal receipts and spending which I presume to be accurate;




The reporter graduated from college in 2001 and has been an economics reporter for three years, first for the Economist and then for the WSJ, so he should be a bit more aware of basic facts. Even more, his editor should.

"All power to the Soviets!" Central bank overreach in Sweden and elsewhere

I remembered Lenin's phrase "All power to the Soviets!" when I read this morning that Stefan Ingves, head of Sweden's central bank, thinks that the bank should have more power over the economy. Specifically, the Financial Supervisory Authority (FSA) is standing in the way of the central bank's direct regulation of the housing market. Ingves proposes that the FSA be merged into the central bank. (i.e. eliminated and its authority given to the CB)

Sweden's economy grew 4.5% last year and is expected to grow 3.5% this year. The central bank lending rate is -0.5%. (I believe that Sweden was the first to go negative.) The bank has also done the requisite quantitative easing. The fly in the ointment is that inflation is only 0.4% whilst the target is 2.0%.

Personally, I don't see why stable prices and a booming economy is not considered a good enough result. The Central bank, which seems quite pleased with itself, says, however, that it needs more power so that things will be even better.

It's human nature: everyone thinks he ought to have more power.

Will Armenia be center stage for the conflict between Russia and Turkey?

Azerbaijan has been gearing up to recapture Nagorno Karabakh from Armenia. It now spends more on defense than the entire Armenian budget. Here are two paragraphs from a recent article:

Azerbaijan's government has consistently bragged about its defense budget, which, starting in 2011, it claimed exceeded Armenia's entire state budget. Azerbaijan's Foreign Ministry spokesman Hikmat Hajiyev told the American newspaper Defense News in a story published this week that that "defense spending had enabled the Azerbaijani armed forces to be supplied with requisite advanced weaponry needed to re-take 
'its Armenian-held territories.'"

“It is our priority and we will continue to increase military spending," said Azerbaijan President Ilham Aliyev in 2014. "Over the past 10 years, our military spending has increased more than 20-fold, and our spending allocated to the armed forces is approximately twice as large as Armenia’s overall state budget."

The drop in oil prices means that this level of spending cannot be sustained, so the time to act is now. Russia has a base in Armenia that is a potential threat to Turkey. President Erdogan of Turkey, who may be one of the most dangerous men in the world with his dreams of the restoration of the Ottoman Empire, said, “We pray our Azerbaijani brothers will prevail in these clashes.” Azerbaijan would not have attacked without Turkey's acquiescence.

Will Armenia be center stage for the conflict between Russia and Turkey?

Deutsche Bank is not a happy camper

Deutsche Bank has been deleveraging. (WSJ, A1) Leverage pre-crisis was 61:1 compared to a European bank average of 39:1 and a US average of 13:1. Now, after selling €11 billion in equity and €5 billion in CoCos and shrinking its book leverage is 21:1, compared to 18:1 for the average European bank and 12:1 for the US. (WSJ numbers) The new CEO John Cryan is making further cuts after the €6.77 billion loss in 2015; his nickname in the bank is “Mr. Grumpy.”

Lower leverage means lower profit (and loss) potential.

Factoid: US economic expectations in 2010

The WSJ today (A2) says that the US Government predicted in 2010 that growth from 2010 to 2015 would be 3.9%/yr and unemployment would drop from 10% to 5.9%. Growth was 2.1%/yr and unemployment dropped to 4.9%. The difference between growth and unemployment is anomalous; perhaps we are mismeasuring one or the other.

Factoid: Surprising increase in US gasoline demand

Today's WSJ reported that US gasoline demand in the 4 weeks ending last Friday averaged 9.4 million BPD, which is a summer peak-like level. (8.8 mn BPD in same period in 2014 and 2015.) Lower prices are having their logical effect. (Total oil demand was 19.4 mn BPD in 2015.)

Separated at birth: Russian gold reserves and Switzerland's 5000 franc bill

I recently read (WSJ, 2/23/16, C2) that demand for the CHF 1000 note, currently Switzerland's largest denomination, has been increasing as Swiss central bank rates have turned negative. This raises the fear that local depositors will soon be charged for storing their money in banks. There are now CHF 45.2 bn (US$45.7 bn) in circulation, a 17% increase in the last twelve months.

Two gnome-like parliamentarians from Zug, near Zurich zeroed in on this and proposed that the SNB also Issue CHF 5000 notes, arguing that "an individual's ability to keep wealth stockpiled in cash, and out of the reach of banks, digital payment systems or the government, is a fundamental right." (WSJ's paraphrase)

Meanwhile back in the Kremlin, Bank of Russia President Elvira Nabuillina, a Tartar and worthy scion of the Golden Horde, whom Euromoney has named Central Banker of the Year in 2015, is buying all the gold she can get her hands on. (Well, almost all) In the fourth quarter, the Bank was reportedly the world's largest single buyer of gold, and in January alone it added another 700,000 ounces ($840 mn). Russia's concern is that by holding dollars in reserve it risks having them effectively cancelled by denial of access to the international transfer system, which is the only way these ones and zeroes in the their computer have any value. It is interesting that the Zug solons also expressed concern for digital payment systems in arguing for the CHF 5000 bill. (By the way, one of the ideas discussed last year by the US authorities was to close the payment system to Russia to force them to default on their external debts, which are mainly corporate, thus strewing chaos; international creditors did not like this idea, however.)

Money is a means of exchange and a store of value. In the dollar world, both of these functions are available at the pleasure, and only at the pleasure of the Fed and the US Treasury. That is why politics worry some and "unconventional policies" worry others.