Our basic fiscal problem in the US is too few people pay income tax and too many received welfare benefits.
Only about 1/2 of the population live in households that pay taxes:
This parallels the increase in the numbers of "takers" relative to "givers."
Thursday, September 4, 2014
Saturday, August 23, 2014
Famous last words
David Tang has this anecdote in today's FT: “Talking of death, I have
always admired the optimism of Spain’s General Franco who regarded himself as
almost immortal. Once, it is said, he
was lying, extremely weakly, in bed and everyone around him thought he was
going to die. Hearing a great deal of
commotion and noise, the dictator asked, with a weakening hand, “What’s all
that noise?” His aide replied: “General,
that's the crowd outside. Your
people. There are thousands of them
chanting your name. They have come to
say farewell.” The General looked
faintly puzzled and asked: “Where are they going?”
Thursday, August 21, 2014
WIll Russia benefit from sanctions?
Interesting article on Russian agricultural in yesterday's FT. Russia exports energy and imports food and manufactured products. It's exports have not been affected by sanctions, therefore. In response to western sanctions, Russia has banned the import of many foodstuffs.
Russia has 0.8 hectares of arable land/capita, about the same as Argentina and Ukraine but still imports 40% of its food. With bans on imports from Europe and a weaker ruble, Russian agriculture may grow. Since the collapse of the Soviet Union, land under cultivation dropped from 90 mn hectares to 73 mn. The poor logistics infrastructure is a barrier. Nonetheless, poultry production is up 60% since 2008 and pork 36%. Will Russia become self-sufficient in and then an exporter of food? Russia already generates excess cash flow; this would increase greatly without food imports.
Russia has 0.8 hectares of arable land/capita, about the same as Argentina and Ukraine but still imports 40% of its food. With bans on imports from Europe and a weaker ruble, Russian agriculture may grow. Since the collapse of the Soviet Union, land under cultivation dropped from 90 mn hectares to 73 mn. The poor logistics infrastructure is a barrier. Nonetheless, poultry production is up 60% since 2008 and pork 36%. Will Russia become self-sufficient in and then an exporter of food? Russia already generates excess cash flow; this would increase greatly without food imports.
IBM: "Skim milk masquerades as cream."
I liberated these graphs from Dan Oliver of Myrmikan Capital.
IBM has clearly benefitted from Quantitative Easing by replacing expensive equity with cheap debt.
Wednesday, August 20, 2014
Thursday, August 14, 2014
Proof that Americans are more smart than those other dopes
from the New York Times
In the early 1980s "the A&W restaurant chain released a new hamburger to rival the McDonald’s Quarter Pounder. With a third-pound of beef, the A&W burger had more meat than the Quarter Pounder; in taste tests, customers preferred A&W’s burger. And it was less expensive. A lavish A&W television and radio marketing campaign cited these benefits. Yet instead of leaping at the great value, customers snubbed it.
"Only when the company held customer focus groups did it become clear why. The Third Pounder presented the American public with a test in fractions. And we failed. Misunderstanding the value of one-third, customers believed they were being overcharged. Why, they asked the researchers, should they pay the same amount for a third of a pound of meat as they did for a quarter-pound of meat at McDonald’s. The “4” in “¼,” larger than the “3” in “⅓,” led them astray."
In the early 1980s "the A&W restaurant chain released a new hamburger to rival the McDonald’s Quarter Pounder. With a third-pound of beef, the A&W burger had more meat than the Quarter Pounder; in taste tests, customers preferred A&W’s burger. And it was less expensive. A lavish A&W television and radio marketing campaign cited these benefits. Yet instead of leaping at the great value, customers snubbed it.
"Only when the company held customer focus groups did it become clear why. The Third Pounder presented the American public with a test in fractions. And we failed. Misunderstanding the value of one-third, customers believed they were being overcharged. Why, they asked the researchers, should they pay the same amount for a third of a pound of meat as they did for a quarter-pound of meat at McDonald’s. The “4” in “¼,” larger than the “3” in “⅓,” led them astray."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)