The Economist, too, is living in a fantasy land: "The audacity of hope"

President Obama has rightly and repeatedly pointed out that anyone who believes the economy is not doing well is "living in a fantasy land."

The Economist has moved to this fantasy land. The current issue has a report on guaranteed incomes. ("Sighing for paradise to come") In it there is graph with the tongue-in-cheek title of "The audacity of hope." (That is also the title of Obama's 2006 book.) It shows that the median salaries of full-time workers in the US are basically unchanged since 2000 A.D. despite a 15% increase in GDP/capital. (Britain did better than the US in both GDP/capita and earnings.)

On top of that, of course, is the fact that fewer workers have full-time jobs and the numbers of those outside the workforce has grown considerably.



To misquote T.S. Eliot, "I'll show you malaise in a handful of dust." (I guess misquoting Eliot is one of the things people in a fantasy land do.)

1st Q US GDP: Right for the wrong reasons

1st quarter US GDP was reported at +0.5% yesterday, which is weak but still positive. This graphic from the WSJ shows that consumer spending on services, residential investment, and state and local government have accounted for more than all the increase.



Here is are some factoids from the "Contributions to Percent Change" table of the BEA press release:



Without the housing bubble (thanks, Fed), Obamacare, and government spending, 1st Q GDP would have been down .82% This does not seem like a productive economy to me, or am I missing something?